RE: Another Quiz

From: Walker, James - Is (JWALKER2@PARTNERS.ORG)
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 09:17:20 GMT-3


Besides missing the area command under ospf process, you've put int s0 and
e0 to be passive and there is no neighbor defined and will not form ospf
adjacencies on the interfaces.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Kenneth Wygand
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2004 3:47 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Another Quiz

Here's another quiz... this one hung me up for a while until I realized
what I overlooked!

What is wrong (or just not typical) with the following configuration,
and what is the implication?

! START OF CONFIG

Int s0

   Ip add 10.10.1.0 255.255.255.0

   Ip ospf network point-to-multipoint

   No sh

Int s1

   Ip add 10.10.2.0 255.255.255.0

   Ip ospf network point-to-point

   No sh

Int e0

   Ip add 10.10.3.0 255.255.255.0

   Ip ospf network broadcast

   No sh

Router Ospf 65535

   Netwo 10.0.0.0 0.0.255.255

   No auto

   Pass s0

   Pass e0

! END OF CONFIG

Kenneth E. Wygand
Systems Engineer, Project Services

CISSP #37102, CCNP, CCDP, ACSP, Cisco IPT Design Specialist, MCP, CNA,
Network+, A+
Custom Computer Specialists, Inc.

"I am not really smart. I just stick with problems longer."
-Albert Einstein

Custom Computer Specialists, Inc.

"Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence"

[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image001.gif]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:58 GMT-3