RE: Failed again - recommendation to regrade?

From: Richard Dumoulin (richard.dumoulin@vanco.es)
Date: Tue Apr 27 2004 - 04:42:02 GMT-3


Hi Kenneth, sorry to hear that. But have you tried a mock lab ? The
feedback is well worth to detect errors you may not notice on your own.
I took one last week and one of my errors was that whenever I would
configure a frame-relay subinterface I would type "interface serial 0/0.1
point-to-point" instead of "interface serial0/0.301 point-to-point" which
was on the diagram !?!?!? It is a stupid mistake I would never had
noticed on my own.

Regards

--Richard

-----Original Message-----
From: Kenneth Wygand [mailto:KWygand@customonline.com]
Sent: martes, 27 de abril de 2004 3:13
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Failed again - recommendation to regrade?

Well according to Cisco, I just failed my second attempt at RTP. Funny
thing is I think I failed by approximately 9 points, yet some of the
sections they took points from were working perfectly! Satisfied all the
requirements and 99% sure I determined and avoided all the pitfalls.

I'm going to go for the regrade and hope to make the 0.000000003% (or at
least that's how it seems). I just hope the proctor regrading the exam
doesn't care more about keeping the "overturned regrades ratio" down than
doing an honest regrade.

Honestly, I think the proctor that answers your questions should be the
proctor that grades (or at least regrades) your exam. I'm not confident the
answers to the questions I received from my proctor are consistent across
all proctors grading these exams.

::sigh:: I'll keep you all updated.

Kenneth E. Wygand
Systems Engineer, Project Services

CISSP #37102, CCNP, CCDP, ACSP, Cisco IPT Design Specialist, MCP, CNA,
Network+, A+
Custom Computer Specialists, Inc.

"I am not really smart. I just stick with problems longer." -Albert Einstein

Custom Computer Specialists, Inc.

"Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence"

[GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
image001.gif]



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:56 GMT-3