From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Tue Apr 27 2004 - 07:49:49 GMT-3
Hey Richard,
Unless you're told the sub has to be specified that particular way in the
lab instructions, it doesn't matter if you use int s0.1 or int s0.<dlci>
At least that's my understanding. And, I'm 99% confident that is correct.
If someone knows differently, I'd like to hear what they have to say.
Tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Dumoulin" <richard.dumoulin@vanco.es>
To: "Kenneth Wygand" <KWygand@customonline.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2004 3:42 AM
Subject: RE: Failed again - recommendation to regrade?
> Hi Kenneth, sorry to hear that. But have you tried a mock lab ? The
> feedback is well worth to detect errors you may not notice on your own.
> I took one last week and one of my errors was that whenever I would
> configure a frame-relay subinterface I would type "interface serial 0/0.1
> point-to-point" instead of "interface serial0/0.301 point-to-point" which
> was on the diagram !?!?!? It is a stupid mistake I would never had
> noticed on my own.
>
> Regards
>
> --Richard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kenneth Wygand [mailto:KWygand@customonline.com]
> Sent: martes, 27 de abril de 2004 3:13
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Failed again - recommendation to regrade?
>
>
> Well according to Cisco, I just failed my second attempt at RTP. Funny
> thing is I think I failed by approximately 9 points, yet some of the
> sections they took points from were working perfectly! Satisfied all the
> requirements and 99% sure I determined and avoided all the pitfalls.
>
>
>
> I'm going to go for the regrade and hope to make the 0.000000003% (or at
> least that's how it seems). I just hope the proctor regrading the exam
> doesn't care more about keeping the "overturned regrades ratio" down than
> doing an honest regrade.
>
>
>
> Honestly, I think the proctor that answers your questions should be the
> proctor that grades (or at least regrades) your exam. I'm not confident
the
> answers to the questions I received from my proctor are consistent across
> all proctors grading these exams.
>
>
>
> ::sigh:: I'll keep you all updated.
>
>
>
> Kenneth E. Wygand
> Systems Engineer, Project Services
>
> CISSP #37102, CCNP, CCDP, ACSP, Cisco IPT Design Specialist, MCP, CNA,
> Network+, A+
> Custom Computer Specialists, Inc.
>
> "I am not really smart. I just stick with problems longer." -Albert
Einstein
>
>
>
> Custom Computer Specialists, Inc.
>
> "Celebrating 25 Years of Excellence"
>
> [GroupStudy removed an attachment of type image/gif which had a name of
> image001.gif]
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:56 GMT-3