From: Amer Mdanat \(amdanat\) (amdanat@cisco.com)
Date: Sat Apr 17 2004 - 18:41:41 GMT-3
The point is that you only NEED to have it on one side of the link
because the two routers will negotiate that and set the link on both
sides as a demand circuit and this will be reflected on the routes
learnt from both routers.
If you add it on both ends it should still work but you do not need to
do that.
Regards;
Amer
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Carlos Marchini
Sent: 18 April 2004 01:26
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Can you have the "ip ospf demand-circuit" in both sides of a
BRI link?
Can you have the "ip ospf demand-circuit" in both sides of a BRI link?
Books that I have read say that you are only supposed to have this
command in one side of the link and I was told the same thing in the
ccbootcamp I attended.
I found this document in Cisco site (Document 4808):
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk365/tk480/technologies_tech_note09186a
0080
09481b.shtml
This document claims that you can use the "ip ospf demand-circuit" in
both sides. Does this cause problems?
Also, is it good practice to include the "no peer neighbor-route"
command in the BRI interfaces to keep redistribution from bring up the
bri links.
Thanks,
Carlos A. Marchini
Email - cmarchini@signetdiagnostic.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:49 GMT-3