From: Jonathan Hays (nomad@gfoyle.org)
Date: Sat Apr 10 2004 - 17:18:46 GMT-3
you wrote:
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
>Behalf Of Fernando Rodriguez
>Sent: Saturday, April 10, 2004 2:20 PM
>To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: Prefix list...yes, again
>
>
>Hi all,
>Just a quick question. I know this has been talked a
>thousand times all over but I still don4t get the
>point. I keep on reading a long mail that Bill
>Lijewski sent a few days ago but...
>Just quick to the point. I have the networks from
>192.168.1.0 to 192.168.8.0. I want a prefix list to
>only redistribute 192.168.0.1, 192.168.0.2,
>192.168.0.3 and 192.168.0.8.
>
>I believe the answer is 192.168.4.0 0.0.3.0...how do
>you end having that?
>Sorry once again but I just don4t get it.
>Thanks a lot,
>Fernando
= = =
Your mask (0.0.3.0) in binary is 000000000000000000000011000000000.
Prefix lists do NOT allow non-contiguous masks, like access lists do. If
you must use a mask such as 0.0.3.0 you must use ACLs.
It's been a while since I've seen anyone post this link:
http://www.catspace.com/prefix.htm
Check it out. It's a good prefix list quiz.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:46 GMT-3