From: Peter van Oene (pvo@usermail.com)
Date: Fri Apr 02 2004 - 16:07:05 GMT-3
At 02:39 PM 4/1/2004, Zack Damen wrote:
>MAYBE A GRE TUNNEL?
I'm not even sure what the issue is.
>ZD
>
>At 10:44 AM 3/24/2004, Peter van Oene wrote:
>>At 11:41 AM 3/24/2004, Ashok Verma \(ashoverm\) wrote:
>>>One quick question about OSPF,
>>> area 5 area3
>>>area 0
>>> lo0 --------------- R1
>>>-------------------------------------------------R2---------------------
>>>-------------------------R3
>>>
>>>On R1 I have a loopback and we need to put in area 5,
>>>
>>>My question is on R3 can I have this loopback address in routing table
>>>without using ospf virtual link between R2 and R1
>>
>>Your diagram didn't come through well and I'm not sure what you intended
>>to describe. If R3 is already in the OSPF domain, adding the loopback to
>>the process shouldn't cause any issue. I'm certain there is more here
>>though ;-)
>>
>>
>>>( as far as I know for nonbackbone( which is not connected to area 0) to
>>>backbone area you need to use the virtual link ....you can not do using
>>>the tunnel ineterface....as we do in case of two separated area 0s)
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>
>>>Ashok Kumar Verma
>>>CCIP,CCDP,CCNP
>>>Network Consulting Engineer
>>>Customer Advocacy Advanced Service Dep.
>>>Service Provider AS Div.2
>>>Cisco Systems, K.K.Japan.
>>>
>>>Tel: +81-3-5324-4583
>>>e-mail: ashoverm@cisco.com
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>>>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>>>
>>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>>
>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:41 GMT-3