From: Zack Damen (zack@supertux.com)
Date: Thu Apr 01 2004 - 16:39:56 GMT-3
MAYBE A GRE TUNNEL?
ZD
At 10:44 AM 3/24/2004, Peter van Oene wrote:
>At 11:41 AM 3/24/2004, Ashok Verma \(ashoverm\) wrote:
>>One quick question about OSPF,
>> area 5 area3
>>area 0
>> lo0 --------------- R1
>>-------------------------------------------------R2---------------------
>>-------------------------R3
>>
>>On R1 I have a loopback and we need to put in area 5,
>>
>>My question is on R3 can I have this loopback address in routing table
>>without using ospf virtual link between R2 and R1
>
>Your diagram didn't come through well and I'm not sure what you intended
>to describe. If R3 is already in the OSPF domain, adding the loopback to
>the process shouldn't cause any issue. I'm certain there is more here
>though ;-)
>
>
>>( as far as I know for nonbackbone( which is not connected to area 0) to
>>backbone area you need to use the virtual link ....you can not do using
>>the tunnel ineterface....as we do in case of two separated area 0s)
>>
>>Thanks
>>
>>Ashok Kumar Verma
>>CCIP,CCDP,CCNP
>>Network Consulting Engineer
>>Customer Advocacy Advanced Service Dep.
>>Service Provider AS Div.2
>>Cisco Systems, K.K.Japan.
>>
>>Tel: +81-3-5324-4583
>>e-mail: ashoverm@cisco.com
>>
>>_______________________________________________________________________
>>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>>
>>Subscription information may be found at:
>>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon May 03 2004 - 19:48:41 GMT-3