From: miken (miken@sisna.com)
Date: Thu Mar 25 2004 - 13:30:51 GMT-3
This should answer your question:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/partner/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080133ddd.shtml
Thanks
Mike Nygard, CCIE#12602
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bola Adegbonmire" <bolaccie@yahoo.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>; <bdennis@internetworkexpert.com>;
<bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com>; <swm@emanon.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 12:13 AM
Subject: NAT and CBWQ - what order?
> Hi All,
>
> I have s scenario with at a cafe where there is a quantum box (for VOIP
calls) and workstations. Private IP addresses will be running on this hosts
connected to a 2611XM router (12.2(8)T). I need to do the following
>
> NAT addresses to the global addresses available to the cafe
> ensure that the voice box receives priority 50 percent of vailable
> others the remaining
>
> My question is what order does the router treat NAT and CBWQ
>
> The issue is when I set my access-list on output interfaces should I
specify NAT addresses or the private IP?
> My take is that if NAT comes before service-policy ouput is treated, then
I will have to make my match clause with NAT address, if it comes after I
will have to make it with private addresses.
>
> Also I keep getting this error message on router that CBWQ can only be
enabled for output and not input when I put a service-policy input .... on
interface. Please when can I use input and output service-policy? When is it
valid.
>
> Will appreciate explanation
>
> Regards,
>
> Bola
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:47 GMT-3