From: Sergio Jimenez Arguedas (sejimenez@its.co.cr)
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:36:48 GMT-3
Hi there,
I know that but....the doubt is the following:
How about traffic-share min across-interface?
Sergio
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Matijevic" <matijevi@bellsouth.net>
To: "'Sergio Jimenez Arguedas'" <sejimenez@its.co.cr>;
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 2:44 PM
Subject: RE: Load Balancing Scenario!!!
> Hello Sergio,
> I don't think what you are asking is possible without disabling
> route-cache and process switching the packets. The function you are
> asking for is layer 2 regardless of the routing layer 3 protocol
> configured on top. Maybe someone else might have another take on it. But
> I really cant see any other solution then to disable route-cache, in
> order to process switch the packets and perform per packet
> load-balancing. Remember routing is just telling where to send the
> packets, it's the switching engine that actually forwards the traffic.
> Sincerely,
> Matijevic
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Sergio Jimenez Arguedas
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 3:22 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Fw: Load Balancing Scenario!!!
>
> Can somebody help me, please?
>
>
> Rgds,
>
>
> Sergio
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Sergio Jimenez Arguedas
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:40 AM
> Subject: Load Balancing Scenario!!!
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> Can somebody help with the following situation?
>
>
>
>
>
> _s0____________EIGRP__________s0_
> NetA ----EIGRP------R1
> R2
> --s1----------
> ----EIGRP--------------s1--
>
>
> R2 is a 1700 router with an IOS 12.0(7)
>
> R2 has two routes to NetA with the same metric, so EIGRP makes load
> balancing.
>
> R2 has fastswitching and I want to make loadbalancing per-packet. I
> CAN4T use
> CEF because the router doesn4t support it, also I don4t want to use
> Proccess
> Switching in order to avoid problems with the CPU.
>
> How about.......EIGRP Feature: traffic-share min across-interfaces?
>
> It says:
> When the traffic-share min command is used with the across-interfaces
> keyword,
> an attempt is made
>
> to use as many different interfaces as possible to forward traffic to
> the same
> destination. When the
>
> maximum path limit has been reached and a new path is installed, the
> router
> compares the installed paths.
>
> For example, if path X references the same interface as path Y and the
> new
> path uses a different interface,
>
> path X is removed and the new path is installed.
>
> To configure traffic that is distributed among multiple routes of
> unequal cost
> for equal cost paths across
>
> multiple interfaces, use the following command in router configuration
> mode:
> R2(Config-Router)#traffic-share min across-interfaces
>
>
>
>
>
> I really don4t understand if it is per-packet with that feature of
> EIGRP,
> because R2 has FASTSWITCHING!!!
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> Sergio Jiminez A.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:35 GMT-3