From: Moffat, Ed (EMoffat@fsci.com)
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 18:27:18 GMT-3
I'm not clear from your drawing whether you have two serials connected to
the same routers on both sides or whether the second equal path takes a
different route. If they are in-line then perhaps you could use a ppp
multilink bundle to accomplish the spirit of what you are trying to do.
-Ed-
-----Original Message-----
From: John Matijevic [mailto:matijevi@bellsouth.net]
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:44 PM
To: 'Sergio Jimenez Arguedas'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Load Balancing Scenario!!!
Hello Sergio,
I don't think what you are asking is possible without disabling route-cache
and process switching the packets. The function you are asking for is layer
2 regardless of the routing layer 3 protocol configured on top. Maybe
someone else might have another take on it. But I really cant see any other
solution then to disable route-cache, in order to process switch the packets
and perform per packet load-balancing. Remember routing is just telling
where to send the packets, it's the switching engine that actually forwards
the traffic.
Sincerely,
Matijevic
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Sergio Jimenez Arguedas
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 3:22 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Fw: Load Balancing Scenario!!!
Can somebody help me, please?
Rgds,
Sergio
----- Original Message -----
From: Sergio Jimenez Arguedas
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:40 AM
Subject: Load Balancing Scenario!!!
Hi all,
Can somebody help with the following situation?
_s0____________EIGRP__________s0_
NetA ----EIGRP------R1
R2
--s1----------
----EIGRP--------------s1--
R2 is a 1700 router with an IOS 12.0(7)
R2 has two routes to NetA with the same metric, so EIGRP makes load
balancing.
R2 has fastswitching and I want to make loadbalancing per-packet. I CAN4T
use CEF because the router doesn4t support it, also I don4t want to use
Proccess Switching in order to avoid problems with the CPU.
How about.......EIGRP Feature: traffic-share min across-interfaces?
It says:
When the traffic-share min command is used with the across-interfaces
keyword, an attempt is made
to use as many different interfaces as possible to forward traffic to the
same destination. When the
maximum path limit has been reached and a new path is installed, the router
compares the installed paths.
For example, if path X references the same interface as path Y and the new
path uses a different interface,
path X is removed and the new path is installed.
To configure traffic that is distributed among multiple routes of unequal
cost for equal cost paths across
multiple interfaces, use the following command in router configuration
mode:
R2(Config-Router)#traffic-share min across-interfaces
I really don4t understand if it is per-packet with that feature of EIGRP,
because R2 has FASTSWITCHING!!!
Thanks,
Sergio Jiminez A.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:34 GMT-3