From: Scott, Tyson C (tyson.scott@hp.com)
Date: Wed Mar 17 2004 - 10:44:23 GMT-3
If you can add a tunnel interface make a tunnel interface like the
following and the route will then be redistributed it.
R2
Int tunnel 0
Ip add 192.168.2.2 255.255.255.0
Tunnel source interface x
Tunnel destination x.x.x.x
!
Router rip
Net 192.168.0.0
R3
Int tunnel 0
Ip address 192.168.2.3 255.255.255.0
Tunnel source interface x
Tunnel destination x.x.x.x
!
Router rip
Net 192.168.0.0
Pass inter default
No passive tunnel 0
No passive "rest of rip interfaces"
Regards,
Tyson Scott
Agilent Problem Management Team
Managed Network Services
Phone: 313-583-5812
Pager: 877-997-0811
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
JBell
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 6:14 PM
To: ccie groupstudy com
Subject: Fw: RIP /16 is hurting me...er...Help?
----- Original Message -----
From: JBell
To: ccie groupstudy com
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:11 PM
Subject: RIP /16 is hurting me...er...Help?
Hi Party People
Got a rip route problem. R1---r2----r3, r1/r2 are running rip and r2/3
are
running ospf. rip network is 200.10.10.0/24 and ospf network is
192.168.1.0/24. How do I redistribute/filter so that r1 only receives a
/16
route for the 192.168.1.0 network. I tried pre-fix list, which did not
work. I
think it has something to do with "reverse path".
I would really appreciate any help you can give me as I just cannot find
a
solution.
Thanks alot...if you could jump on messenger a give me a quick tutorial
it
would be even better.
Jbell.
Ms Jennifer Bellucci
**Note: Do not send file attachments without prior approval, as the
E-mail
will be deleted, without being read. No attempt to contact the sender
will be
made.
***This is for protection of both parties.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:32 GMT-3