From: Marko Berend (marko.berend@storm.hr)
Date: Wed Mar 17 2004 - 10:43:00 GMT-3
Try
area 0 range 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0 under ospf
and filter out 192.168.1.0
M
-----Original Message-----
From: JBell [mailto:Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 1:57 AM
To: Lee Donald; ccie groupstudy com
Subject: Re: RIP /16 is hurting me...er...Help?
You are not allowed to use summary route, I had thought of that already,
thanks anyway.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lee Donald" <Lee.Donald@bacs.co.uk>
To: "JBell" <Jennifer_bellucci@hotmail.com>; "ccie groupstudy com"
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 11:28 AM
Subject: RE: RIP /16 is hurting me...er...Help?
Use a summary route for 192.168.1.0.
Use the summary-address command under OSPF.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
JBell
Sent: 16 March 2004 23:14
To: ccie groupstudy com
Subject: Fw: RIP /16 is hurting me...er...Help?
----- Original Message -----
From: JBell
To: ccie groupstudy com
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:11 PM
Subject: RIP /16 is hurting me...er...Help?
Hi Party People
Got a rip route problem. R1---r2----r3, r1/r2 are running rip and r2/3
are running ospf. rip network is 200.10.10.0/24 and ospf network is
192.168.1.0/24. How do I redistribute/filter so that r1 only receives a
/16 route for the 192.168.1.0 network. I tried pre-fix list, which did
not work. I think it has something to do with "reverse path".
I would really appreciate any help you can give me as I just cannot find
a solution.
Thanks alot...if you could jump on messenger a give me a quick tutorial
it would be even better.
Jbell.
Ms Jennifer Bellucci
**Note: Do not send file attachments without prior approval, as the
E-mail will be deleted, without being read. No attempt to contact the
sender will be made.
***This is for protection of both parties.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:32 GMT-3