From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Mar 08 2004 - 20:06:18 GMT-3
Anything is fair game! :) It is a "possible" topic.
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIS, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
alsontra@hotmail.com
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 4:15 PM
To: patrick.basso
Cc: Scott Morris
Subject: FST valid topic?
Is FST still a valid topic?
Thanks,
Alsontra
-----Original Message-----
In IOS 12.0, FST has been enhanced to allow ethernet to ethernet. Exciting
huh? :) Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
CISSP, JNCIS, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Edwards, Andrew M
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 7:41 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: re: reading on dlsw spurs question so I was reading more about dlsw
and the following occurred to me...
Token Ring is no longer tested on the lab. Since FST and Direct
encapsulation require hosts to be on Token Ring segments, is it safe to say
that the only dlsw encapsulations we should hammer hard are TCP and DLSW
lite (frame-relay)?
Then, understanding their primary differences we could expect to see
requirements that drive selection such as 'use encapsulation with lowest
over head' or after reading the whole lab we might see in a later section to
'setup border peers between Rx and Ry'.
Any other thoughts on this?
andy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:16 GMT-3