RE: Frame-Relay Inverse-Arp

From: Kenneth Wygand (KWygand@customonline.com)
Date: Tue Mar 02 2004 - 20:59:17 GMT-3

Next message: ihatecisco@att.net: "Re: Your Next Step is CCIE [Cisco feeling the burn]"
Previous message: Jay Hennigan: "Re: Your Next Step is CCIE [Cisco feeling the burn]"
Maybe in reply to: Ahmed Mustafa: "Frame-Relay Inverse-Arp"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: Frame-Relay Inverse-Arp"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Brian,

If it's not too much bother (I'm sure you know them off the top of your head), can you tell me for which (sub)interface types inverse-arp is en/disabled?

Thanks!
Ken

        -----Original Message-----
        From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Brian Dennis
        Sent: Tue 3/2/2004 5:57 PM
        To: 'Ahmed Mustafa'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
        Cc:
        Subject: RE: Frame-Relay Inverse-Arp

                The rule of thumb is that the command is applied wherever the IP
        address is assigned.

                As a side note, if using multipoint subinterfaces with only static
        mappings then InARP does not need to be disabled.

        Brian Dennis, CCIE #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security)
        bdennis@internetworkexpert.com
        Internetwork Expert, Inc.
        http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
        Toll Free: 877-224-8987
        Direct: 775-745-6404 (Outside the US and Canada)

        -----Original Message-----
        From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
        Ahmed Mustafa
        Sent: Monday, March 01, 2004 9:49 PM
        To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
        Subject: Frame-Relay Inverse-Arp

           Can the command "No Frame-relay Inverse-Arp" be applied on a
        sub-interface
        or has to be a physical interface.

        If there is a case where Hub router has a multipoint interface to spoke 1
        and
        spoke 2, and another multipoint interface to spoke 3. The scenerio requires
        that dynamic frame-relay must be disabled on first multipoint interface, and
        not on second one.

        _______________________________________________________________________
        Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
        http://shop.groupstudy.com <http://shop.groupstudy.com/>

        Subscription information may be found at:
        http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

        _______________________________________________________________________
        Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
        http://shop.groupstudy.com <http://shop.groupstudy.com/>

        Subscription information may be found at:
        http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Next message: ihatecisco@att.net: "Re: Your Next Step is CCIE [Cisco feeling the burn]"
Previous message: Jay Hennigan: "Re: Your Next Step is CCIE [Cisco feeling the burn]"
Maybe in reply to: Ahmed Mustafa: "Frame-Relay Inverse-Arp"
Next in thread: Scott Morris: "RE: Frame-Relay Inverse-Arp"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 08:15:13 GMT-3