From: Jonathan Hays (nomad@gfoyle.org)
Date: Sat Feb 28 2004 - 11:23:22 GMT-3
you wrote:
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
>Behalf Of Scott Morris
>Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 9:57 AM
>To: 'Richard Dumoulin'; 'Scott, Tyson C'; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>Subject: RE: TASK 11.1 on Lab 13
>
>
>Is there anything wrong with posting questions like that to a
>general forum?
>I see people do it for CCBootcamp scenarios, for IPExpert
>scenarios, for
>NetMasterclass scenarios... Everyone has their own support
>forum, but that
>doesn't preclude anyone from posting to Groupstudy to perhaps gain the
>opinions of people who aren't working on that scenario, or
>sharing a thought
>process. :)
>
>The licensing agreement with each of the companies precludes you from
>sharing the lab with people (e.g. copying it), but not from
>asking questions
>about it. Either that or the IE license seems to be
>interpreted differently
>from others I've looked at. *shrug*
>
>Too much thinking. Relax more!
>
>
>Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider)
>#4713, CISSP,
>JNCIS, et al.
>IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
>IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
>swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
>http://www.ipexpert.net
>
>(as an obvious note, I'm not with IE, although I never have
>seen anyone have
>a problem with posts from other lab vendors questions)
#####
I have yet to see a vendor complain about posting questions about their
proprietary labs on Groupstudy. Pardon me if I sound cynical, but
regardless of whether or not the post points out some egregious error in
the practice scenario, any post regarding the vendor lab is great
publicity for them.
-Jonathan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:13:59 GMT-3