From: Paul Chen (cpjchen@starhub.net.sg)
Date: Mon Feb 16 2004 - 22:55:56 GMT-3
Hi All,
At the following link:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/pd/ibsw/ibdlsw/tech/dls3_rg.htm
We have the following load balancing scenario:
Router A
dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.2.19.1
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.2.24.2 circuit weight 20
dlsw remote-peer 0 tcp 10.2.20.1 circuit weight 10
dlsw load-balance circuit-count
dlsw timer explorer-wait-time 100
The dlsw load-balance circuit-count defaults to 10
, giving the load balance ratio of 2:1
If have a dlsw load-balance circuit-count of 5, do we use the following
for a 4:1 ratio
dlsw remote-peer ..... circuit weight 20
dlsw remote-peer ......circuit weight 5 ??
OR
dlsw remote peer ..... circuit weight 20
dlsw remote peer ----- circuit weight (blank)??
I am confused as to whether we should leave the weight blank or fill in
a value for the second peer
Any help appreciated.
Thanks
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:13:50 GMT-3