RE: priority queue on frame relay subinterface

From: Michael Snyder (msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com)
Date: Mon Feb 16 2004 - 12:44:40 GMT-3

• Next message: Michael Snyder: "RE: DLSW FST encapsulation"
• Previous message: Alec: "Re: DLSW FST encapsulation"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Snyder: "RE: priority queue on frame relay subinterface"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I just noticed the date.

Please disregard my email. I clicked on an old folder and didn't
realize it.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Snyder [mailto:msnyder@revolutioncomputer.com]
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 9:39 AM
To: 'ccielab@groupstudy.com'
Cc: 'Joe'
Subject: RE: priority queue on frame relay subinterface

Yes, the subinterfaces inherit the queuing of the physical.

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe [mailto:leemingho@net-yan.com]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 11:00 PM
To: security@groupstudy.com
Subject: priority queue on frame relay subinterface

Hi group,

Suppose I would like to prioritize IP traffic on a frame-relay
subinterface, will the following configuration work?
Or I should use a map-class?

interface Serial0
 no ip address
 encapsulation frame-relay
 priority-group 1
 no frame-relay inverse-arp
 frame-relay lmi-type ansi
!
interface Serial0.1 point-to-point
 ip address 10.1.1.4 255.255.255.0
 frame-relay interface-dlci 401

priority-list 1 protocol ip high

joe

• Next message: Michael Snyder: "RE: DLSW FST encapsulation"
• Previous message: Alec: "Re: DLSW FST encapsulation"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Snyder: "RE: priority queue on frame relay subinterface"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Mar 05 2004 - 07:13:50 GMT-3