From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Fri Jan 23 2004 - 21:09:50 GMT-3
If your scenario mentioned something configured on the 3550, then the
solution would be either igmp profiles, or VACLs. Unless the 3550 is
participating in the multicast tree, then it's only going to be an
intermmediate interception.
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIS, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net <blocked::http://www.ipexpert.net/>
_____
From: kasturi cisco [mailto:kasturi_cisco@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 6:54 PM
To: swm@emanon.com; annu_roopa@yahoo.com; bsinclair@netmasterclass.net;
wwwjjang@chol.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: How Can i drop the IGMP join message ??
Scott/Bob,
Thanks for answering the Q's.Now i seem to be getting some clairty. I will
modify the original Q (by the poster) to make more realistic disscusion. Let
us say we have a ex requirement which says as below -
1. Configure the 3550 port gig1/0 to drop any 235.35.35.34 IGMP join
messages recieved on the interface ?
My configuration would be as below. Is this correct ?
ip igmp profile 1
deny
range 235.35.35.34
interface gig 1/0
ip igmp filter 1
I dont think the Multicast stub routing will be accurate in this scenario
above. Am i correct in understanding this.Now let us say we have scenario 2
like -
2. Configure the 3550 port gig1/0 to drop any IGMP join messages recieved on
the interface from router R1 for group 235.35.35.34.
- So here we would use Multicast stub routing.
Thanks,
Kasturi.
_____
Contact brides & grooms FREE! Only on www.shaadi.com. Register
<http://g.msn.com/8HMBENIN/2737??PS=> now!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:49 GMT-3