From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Fri Jan 23 2004 - 16:04:36 GMT-3
The method on the Catalyst as Bob points out will filter things from going
between the routers, but will not prevent the routers from trying.
Take a look at implementing multicast stub routing, which may be more what
the scenario is looking for... One router would have an "ip pim
neighbor-filter" command, and the other end would have an "ip igmp
helper-address".
But realize both options exist and what the differences are in case your
scenario leans more towards one than the other!
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713, CISSP,
JNCIS, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
kasturi cisco
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 1:35 PM
To: bsinclair@netmasterclass.net; wwwjjang@chol.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: How Can i drop the IGMP join message ??
So Bob, are u saying this would be a complete solution to req or meets only
a part of it. I guess i am confused with ur answer. If i understand u are
saying it denies the reports from the client on the port lets say
fa0/22 as example, but the route still sends queries.
Thanks.
Kasturi.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact brides & grooms FREE! Only on www.shaadi.com. Register now!
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:49 GMT-3