RE: What happens with too many VLANs?

From: Jeff Chambers (jc@nuvox.net)
Date: Thu Jan 22 2004 - 11:53:51 GMT-3

• Next message: Marko Berend: "RE: What happens with too many VLANs?"
• Previous message: wangstone373: "Re: Local preference issue"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Williams: "What happens with too many VLANs?"
• Next in thread: Marko Berend: "RE: What happens with too many VLANs?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I didn't immediately find documentation relating to the 3500 series
of switches. However, I know that the limitation exists on that
series as well.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/switches/ps4916/products_configuratio
n_guide_chapter09186a008017e52f.html

Supported Spanning-Tree Instances
The switch supports the per-VLAN spanning tree (PVST) and a maximum of 64
spanning-tree instances. For information about how spanning tree
interoperates
with the VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP), see the "STP Configuration
Guidelines" section.

Jeff.

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Marko Berend
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 3:02 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: What happens with too many VLANs?

Hi.

Can anyone please post a link to this problem?
I can't find anything on CCO that would say how many STPs a given switch
supports.
Product reference guide says 250 vlans but this is rediculous.

Thanks,
Marko

• Next message: Marko Berend: "RE: What happens with too many VLANs?"
• Previous message: wangstone373: "Re: Local preference issue"
• Maybe in reply to: Mike Williams: "What happens with too many VLANs?"
• Next in thread: Marko Berend: "RE: What happens with too many VLANs?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:48 GMT-3