From: John Matijevic (matijevi@bellsouth.net)
Date: Sun Jan 04 2004 - 13:09:14 GMT-3
William,
not necessarily, it depends on your scenerio. Can you give an example of
what you trying to accomplish?
Sincerely,
Matijevic
----- Original Message -----
From: "William Chen" <kwchen@netvigator.com>
To: "John Matijevic" <matijevi@bellsouth.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 10:38 AM
Subject: Re: Fair queue & RSVP
> Thx, John
>
> If I do use fair queue at the interface, do I need to set a non-zero
number
> of reservable queues?
>
> Best Regards,
> William Chen
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Matijevic" <matijevi@bellsouth.net>
> To: "William Chen" <kwchen@netvigator.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 11:35 PM
> Subject: Re: Fair queue & RSVP
>
>
> > Hello William,
> > According to the documentation Cd, RSVP does not need fair queue to
work.
> > "RSVP works in conjunction with weighted fair queueing (WFQ) or Random
> Early
> > Detection (RED)." Also from the dqos book page 612 "You also need to
> > configure a queuing tool that supports RSVP on each interface namely
WFQ,
> IP
> > RTP Priority, or LLQ". So the answer to your question is that for RSVP
to
> > work it does not need fair queue.
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Matijevic
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "William Chen" <kwchen@netvigator.com>
> > To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 9:20 AM
> > Subject: Fair queue & RSVP
> >
> >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > For RSVP to work, it needs fair queue. Since the default setting of
> > fair
> > > queue has 0 reservable queues, should we always use the command
> > "fair-queue"
> > > to set a non-zero number of reservable queue?
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > William Chen
> > >
> > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:36 GMT-3