From: William Chen (kwchen@netvigator.com)
Date: Sun Jan 04 2004 - 12:38:14 GMT-3
Thx, John
If I do use fair queue at the interface, do I need to set a non-zero number
of reservable queues?
Best Regards,
William Chen
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Matijevic" <matijevi@bellsouth.net>
To: "William Chen" <kwchen@netvigator.com>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: Fair queue & RSVP
> Hello William,
> According to the documentation Cd, RSVP does not need fair queue to work.
> "RSVP works in conjunction with weighted fair queueing (WFQ) or Random
Early
> Detection (RED)." Also from the dqos book page 612 "You also need to
> configure a queuing tool that supports RSVP on each interface namely WFQ,
IP
> RTP Priority, or LLQ". So the answer to your question is that for RSVP to
> work it does not need fair queue.
>
> Sincerely,
> Matijevic
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William Chen" <kwchen@netvigator.com>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 9:20 AM
> Subject: Fair queue & RSVP
>
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > For RSVP to work, it needs fair queue. Since the default setting of
> fair
> > queue has 0 reservable queues, should we always use the command
> "fair-queue"
> > to set a non-zero number of reservable queue?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > William Chen
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:36 GMT-3