From: Richard L. Pickard (nettable_walker@comcast.net)
Date: Fri Jan 02 2004 - 21:30:04 GMT-3
My viewpoint -
1/3 of the lab is a mind game
1/3 of the lab is the pressure
1/3 of the lab in configuration
Richard
CCIE# 12388
NNCSE CCNP CCDP CCSA MCSE A+
//
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jeff Nelson
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 5:33 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: lab restrictions/interpretations
There is a saying (I saw it written on the wall of a CCIE lab in
Houston)... something like "There are two ways to configure every
scenario; for the CCIE LAB you must know all three."
This is so because of the restrictions and conditions placed on each lab
and scenario. Now, I know a little Cisco-ese, enough to find the
freesnacks breakroom, but it seems like most "example" labs I've tried
contradict themselves. Like saying no static routes and then seeing a
static mroute in configuration answers, or defining Policy Routing as
any source-based traffic manipulation and then using tunneling to
overcome another restriction, or tip toeing around the ol' 0.0.0.0
advertisement restriction--justified because it was produced as a
side-affect of another method..... Anyway, that is probably my biggest
concern at this point, queueing in on the one or two tag words that are
supposed kick my brain into the right type of configuration. I don't
want to be sitting there digging through the CD (wasting prescious time)
looking for that 3rd way (that may or may not exist) because I believe
that it can't be done in the ways I know due to the interpretive
restrictions.
Can anyone give me peace-of-mind on this?
oh yes
/rant
-- jeff
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:36 GMT-3