From: Shafi, Shahid (sshafi@qualcomm.com)
Date: Fri Jan 02 2004 - 21:29:56 GMT-3
Ditto Bob!
Ask intelligent questions and I am telling you, you'll get good answers
and infact hints!
Shahid
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Bob Sinclair
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 4:14 PM
To: Jeff Nelson; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: lab restrictions/interpretations
Hi Jeff,
I have seen four R&S labs, and I can honestly say that I thought they
were all very well written. Cisco evidently puts a lot of time and
thought into them. When I saw something I thought was vague, I was able
to get it cleared up by the proctor - try that route before spending too
much time looking for a missing option. When presenting my question to
the proctor, I often got the answer that I was "thinking too hard". In
other words, the meaining is usually fairly straightforward.
Bob Sinclair
CCIE #10427, CISSP, MCSE
www.netmasterclass.net
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Nelson" <jnelson@rackspace.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 6:33 PM
Subject: lab restrictions/interpretations
> There is a saying (I saw it written on the wall of a CCIE lab in
Houston)... something like "There are two ways to configure every
scenario; for the CCIE LAB you must know all three."
>
> This is so because of the restrictions and conditions placed on each
> lab
and scenario. Now, I know a little Cisco-ese, enough to find the
freesnacks breakroom, but it seems like most "example" labs I've tried
contradict themselves. Like saying no static routes and then seeing a
static mroute in configuration answers, or defining Policy Routing as
any source-based traffic manipulation and then using tunneling to
overcome another restriction, or tip toeing around the ol' 0.0.0.0
advertisement restriction--justified because it was produced as a
side-affect of another method..... Anyway, that is probably my biggest
concern at this point, queueing in on the one or two tag words that are
supposed kick my brain into the right type of configuration. I don't
want to be sitting there digging through the CD (wasting prescious time)
looking for that 3rd way (that may or may not exist) because I believe
that it can't be done in the ways I know due to the interpretive
restrictions.
>
> Can anyone give me peace-of-mind on this?
>
> oh yes
> /rant
>
> --
> jeff
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Feb 02 2004 - 09:07:36 GMT-3