FW: OSPF-EIGRP Interesting Scenario

From: Hoyle, Anthony (AL) (ALHoyle@dow.com)
Date: Sat Dec 06 2003 - 15:51:49 GMT-3


I also thought you could set the distance against an access-list on rb for the four external eigrp routes....yeah I'm about to go play with this now.

Hoyle

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 12:59 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OSPF-EIGRP Interesting Scenario

Hi everyone, Hope you are all very well :)

I have a problem with a scenario, which I need a little help with.

         (50 networks)
         ospf networks
               |
               |
               |
     64k-s0 +----+ 64k-s0
   +---------| Ra |----------+
   | +----+ |
   | ospf ospf |
   | | redist-rtr
+----+ +----+
| Rb |--------------------| Rc |-------------------
+----+ <- eigrp -> +----+ eigrp networks
             1 Gbps (4 networks)

Rb and Rc are running ospf and eigrp - Rc is mutually redistributing eigrp<->ospf. Now Rc is receiving eigrp externals with AD 170.

This means that when redist into ospf, Rb is always going to learn the eigrp routes via the serials and not the 1 gig link becuase of AD.

Can I prevent this with setting distance.

If i set distance on Rc under eigrp, it only sets distance localaly on the router. If I set distance on Rb under eigrp, using distance 90 100, I route via the ethernet for the rest of the ospf network which I dont want.

I know a good design would be to move the redist to Rb, but assume, that cannot happen.

The bottom line is that I want to set only the 4 ex eigrp routes to use the 1gig link.

Can any help with with this scenario?

Best Regards,
Ken

------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about Barclays Capital, please
visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.

Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays
Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes,
it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is
caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays
Group for operational or business reasons.

------------------------------------------------------------------------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:36 GMT-3