RE: The bgp confederation peers as-number [... as-number]

From: Marcus Jensen (marcus@pobox.com)
Date: Fri Dec 05 2003 - 10:25:07 GMT-3


Doyle is clear on this...only need AS number of the peer's AS. But, I see
sample configs to the contrary and have had similar conversations as well.
In the lab I would add them, it is a small over-config with no technical
repercussions.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On
> Behalf Of ccie2be
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 6:21 AM
> To: Group Study
> Subject: The bgp confederation peers as-number [... as-number] command
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> The documentation isn't clear about which sub AS #'s need to
> be listed with
> this command.
>
> So my question is whether all sub AS #'s in the confederation
> should be listed
> or just the sub AS #'s to which this router is connected?
>
> Also, does anybody know what type of problems will result if
> the sub AS #'s
> are misconfigured? For example, if a sub AS # wasn't
> included but should have
> been or if the sub AS # was mistyped.
>
> Thanks in advance, dt
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> _________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study
> materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:36 GMT-3