From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Tue Dec 02 2003 - 20:55:29 GMT-3
The confederation peers should be those that you are directly
peering with. ASs within the confederation but not peered with need not be
listed. If you are peering with another sub-AS within the confederation and
it is not listed as a confederation peer it will be treated as a separate AS
and a true EBGP peering.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 708-362-1418 (Outside the US and Canada)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> ccie2be
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 3:21 PM
> To: Group Study
> Subject: The bgp confederation peers as-number [... as-number] command
>
> Hi all,
>
> The documentation isn't clear about which sub AS #'s need to be listed
> with
> this command.
>
> So my question is whether all sub AS #'s in the confederation should be
> listed
> or just the sub AS #'s to which this router is connected?
>
> Also, does anybody know what type of problems will result if the sub AS
> #'s
> are misconfigured? For example, if a sub AS # wasn't included but should
> have
> been or if the sub AS # was mistyped.
>
> Thanks in advance, dt
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:34 GMT-3