RE: switchport security or mac access-list??

From: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Date: Wed Dec 03 2003 - 23:44:22 GMT-3

• Next message: John Tafasi: "VMPS file name"
• Previous message: Babylon By The Bay: "Re: OT- CCIE MORE EXPENSIVE WHEN RIPPED OFF"
• Maybe in reply to: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "switchport security or mac access-list??"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thank you all for your help on this.

Danny

-----Original Message-----
From: Tony Schaffran [mailto:groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:09 PM
To: Andaluz, Danilo, Triaton/NA; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: switchport security or mac access-list??

I would go with the security. You can usually tell when they are fishing
for an access list. An access list is the easy way out.

Tony Schaffran
Network Analyst
CCIE #11071
CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
 
www.cconlinelabs.com
Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 3:57 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: switchport security or mac access-list??

Hey, Group. If a requirement states to only allow mac-address
1111.1111.1111 on port f0/15, would it be ok to configure a mac access-list
only allowing this mac or would switchport security with the mac address be
the way to go? They both satisfy the requirement. Not sure on this one.
 
Thanks,
Danny

• Next message: John Tafasi: "VMPS file name"
• Previous message: Babylon By The Bay: "Re: OT- CCIE MORE EXPENSIVE WHEN RIPPED OFF"
• Maybe in reply to: Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com: "switchport security or mac access-list??"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Jan 03 2004 - 08:25:35 GMT-3