From: JamesGEF (jamesgef@sympatico.ca)
Date: Tue Nov 11 2003 - 14:14:23 GMT-3
Paul, I believe by doing it that way, at its default configuration, OSPF
will still distribute the routes as /32.
For example,
int lo10
ip address 10.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
router ospf 1
network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
This will distribute the route as 10.1.1.1/32 and not 10.1.1.0/24
James.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Lalonde" <plalonde2@cogeco.ca>
To: "JamesGEF" <jamesgef@sympatico.ca>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: Distributing loopback into OSPF
> Hi James,
>
> network statement under the OSPF process????
>
> Paul
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "JamesGEF" <jamesgef@sympatico.ca>
> To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 11:59 AM
> Subject: Distributing loopback into OSPF
>
>
> > In one of IPExpert 5.0 exercises, I had to distribute loopback IP
> addresses
> > into OSPF without the /32 mask...they had to be seen with 24-bit
subnets.
> It
> > states in the notes that there are 3 ways of doing this. I could only
> think
> > of two:
> >
> > 1. change the network type of the loopback interfaces so that it doesn't
> > default to /32 mask.
> > 2. redistribute connected and summarize the addresses with a /24 mask
> >
> >
> > I can't think of the third way.
> >
> > any ideas?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > James
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> > http://shop.groupstudy.com
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:10 GMT-3