RE: EIGRP auto-summary question

From: R&S Groupstudy (rsg@synergy-networking.co.uk)
Date: Fri Nov 07 2003 - 06:53:44 GMT-3


I notice that Switch1 isn't learing any routes from Router1 or Router2.
Can you ensure that the adjacencies are up?
This may make it work for you, but you're correct, this doesn't explain why
you're seeing a /16 on the 149, but not on the 139...

Adam

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Danny.Andaluz@triaton-na.com
Sent: 07 November 2003 02:44
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: EIGRP auto-summary question

Hey, Group. Why won't EIGRP install a summary for 139.10.0.0 like it did
149.10.0.0????? This has me stumped. >:-|

Here's my logical topology:

http://home.comcast.net/~practice.lab.examples/eigrpautosummary.jpg
<http://home.comcast.net/~practice.lab.examples/eigrpautosummary.jpg>

Thanks,
Danny

switch1# sh run | b router eigrp 100
router eigrp 100
 network 139.10.12.0 0.0.0.255
 network 149.10.11.0 0.0.0.255
 auto-summary
 no eigrp log-neighbor-changes

switch1#sh ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP
       i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter
area
       * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR
       P - periodic downloaded static route

Gateway of last resort is not set

     139.10.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets
C 139.10.10.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
C 139.10.12.0 is directly connected, FastEthernet0/23
C 139.10.45.0 is directly connected, Vlan45
     149.10.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 149.10.11.0/24 is directly connected, Vlan11
D 149.10.0.0/16 is a summary, 00:02:03, Null0
switch1#



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:09 GMT-3