From: asadovnikov (asadovnikov@comcast.net)
Date: Mon Nov 03 2003 - 03:30:50 GMT-3
PIM NBMA mode has some performance improvements compare to pseudo-broadcast,
so it may be a good idea to enable it anyway.
Best regards,
Alexei
P.S. On exam do what they ask, design practices good or bad are not
relevant.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:44 AM
To: Group Study; Ozgur Guler (Garanti Teknoloji)
Subject: Re: Multicast over F/R
Thanks for your response. That's what I had thought, but do you know why
that is?
dt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ozgur Guler (Garanti Teknoloji)" <OzgurG@garanti.com.tr>
To: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 8:31 AM
Subject: RE: Multicast over F/R
no need to use it on the spokes.
it works wo nbma-mode on the spokes...
good luck in your forthcoming attempt.
Ozgur
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
ccie2be
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 3:29 PM
To: Group Study
Subject: Multicast over F/R
Hi group,
I just saw an example from this link
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/cisintwk/intsolns/mcst_sol/frm_rlay.
h
tm
where the command, "ip pim nbma-mode" was used on both the hub and the
spokes.
Why is this used on the spokes and is it required or optional on the spoke
interfaces?
Thanks, dt
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:07 GMT-3