From: Brian McGahan (bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Mon Nov 03 2003 - 03:31:50 GMT-3
Alec,
The extended access-list syntax cannot be used in this manner.
The prefix and prefix-length pair matching with an extended ACL can only
be applied to BGP. For other applications of this matching, simply use
a prefix-list.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Direct: 708-362-1418 (Outside the US and Canada)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> Alec
> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2003 3:03 AM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: RIP filtering /27 prefix
>
> If I am asked to ONLY ALLOW all RIP-learned routes with /27 prefix,
what's
> the difference between the two ? I expect both of them should achieve
the
> same result but unfortunately only the 2nd one works :
>
> router rip
> distribute-list 101 in Ethernet0/0/0.909
>
> router rip
> distribute-list prefix TEST in Ethernet0/0/0.909
>
> access-list 101 permit ip any host 255.255.255.224
> ip prefix-list TEST seq 5 permit 0.0.0.0/0 ge 27 le 27
>
> regards,
> alec
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Dec 12 2003 - 12:29:07 GMT-3