From: W. Alan Robertson (warobertson@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri Oct 24 2003 - 15:09:33 GMT-3
Couldn't tell you what they had to say in the actual lab, as the question
never arose, and if it had, I wouldn't be able to talk about it. :)
It did, however, come up when I was at NetMaster. Their opinion was that a
static multicast route was acceptable. Certainly, if I wanted to use one
during the Lab exam, I'd ask for clarification, but I think it falls outside
the "no static routes" boundary.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yulan Lee" <ylee888@hotmail.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 1:47 PM
Subject: Is "ip mroute " a static route?
> All,
>
>
> If the restriction says, Do not use any static routes, can you use ip
> mroute ?
>
> The sample scenario from DOiT Lab uses it under the restriction of "no
> static routes". Some might say it is a proctor question. If you had
checked
> with proctor in the past, what do they say?
>
>
> Thanks,
> Yulan
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Cheer a special someone with a fun Halloween eCard from American
Greetings!
> Go to http://www.msn.americangreetings.com/index_msn.pd?source=msne134
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:53:07 GMT-3