From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Fri Oct 24 2003 - 14:56:44 GMT-3
That is likely a better question for the proctor. I would venture to
say no, it is not. Because you aren't influencing traffic patterns from
that switch. You are simply modifying the response to an RPF check
within multicast.
But if they had a different solution in mind, given whatever the
scenario is, then they may tell you that it is not allowed at that
point.
It's always safer to ask the proctor for clarification! :)
Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
CISSP, JNCIS, et al.
IPExpert CCIE Program Manager
IPExpert Sr. Technical Instructor
swm@emanon.com/smorris@ipexpert.net
http://www.ipexpert.net
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Yulan Lee
Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 1:48 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Is "ip mroute " a static route?
All,
If the restriction says, Do not use any static routes, can you use ip
mroute ?
The sample scenario from DOiT Lab uses it under the restriction of "no
static routes". Some might say it is a proctor question. If you had
checked
with proctor in the past, what do they say?
Thanks,
Yulan
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:53:07 GMT-3