2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones

From: Erick Bergquist (ebergquist@ameritech.net)
Date: Wed Oct 22 2003 - 02:09:40 GMT-3

• Next message: Larry Letterman: "RE: 2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones"
• Previous message: Ludwig Morales: "Re: OT:POLL on home labs (was RE: Internetwork Expert Upcoming"
• Next in thread: Larry Letterman: "RE: 2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones"
• Maybe reply: Larry Letterman: "RE: 2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones"
• Maybe reply: boby2kusa@hotmail.com: "Re: 2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones"
• Maybe reply: Erick Bergquist: "RE: 2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones"
• Maybe reply: Larry Letterman: "RE: 2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I know this has been discussed before, but for the
life of me I can't find my notes or recall what the
reason was for the XL switches needing to be
configured as trunk ports. On newer switches, access
(dynamic) ports work fine and dynamically form trunk.

Was it a hardware limitation of XL switches (L2 only,
etc) or something else? looking for difference.

Thanks in advance,
Erick

• Next message: Larry Letterman: "RE: 2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones"
• Previous message: Ludwig Morales: "Re: OT:POLL on home labs (was RE: Internetwork Expert Upcoming"
• Next in thread: Larry Letterman: "RE: 2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones"
• Maybe reply: Larry Letterman: "RE: 2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones"
• Maybe reply: boby2kusa@hotmail.com: "Re: 2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones"
• Maybe reply: Erick Bergquist: "RE: 2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones"
• Maybe reply: Larry Letterman: "RE: 2900/3500XL switches and IP Phones"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:53:06 GMT-3