From: Michael Miller (ihatecisco@att.net)
Date: Tue Oct 21 2003 - 16:53:43 GMT-3
in fairness to the fairer members of our board. I will make a comment.
If you have 2 women on the phone, chances are that one is talking and the
other one is actually listening. Hence, VAD still helps to reduce
bandwidth, even if it is only unidirectional.
whereas most men i know would interuppt. lol
----- Original Message -----
From: <Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 12:05 PM
Subject: VAD (just for blokes)
> Guys, I can i just confirm the below is correct and what would happen if
> you had VAD enabled on the FXS (voice port) and not on the dial peer.
>
> VAD ON DIAL-PEER IS ENABLED BY DEFAULT
> VAD ON VOICE PORT DISABLED BY DEFAULT
>
> I assume, by the defaults here, VAD on the dial peer overrides VAD on the
> voice port.
>
> (could this ever be deployed in a women only world?)
>
> Many thx indeed,
> Ken
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> For more information about Barclays Capital, please
> visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com.
>
>
> Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays
> Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
> message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes,
> it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is
> caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are
> solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
> Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays
> Group for operational or business reasons.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
> http://shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:53:06 GMT-3