From: Alexander Arsenyev (GU/ETL) (alexander.arsenyev@ericsson.com)
Date: Mon Oct 20 2003 - 11:06:51 GMT-3
I believe it's under Virtual Template, however, if MLPPP bundle has more than 1 FR PVC You cannot do LFI, see
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1839/products_feature_guide09186a0080087be6.html
section "Restrictions".
HTH,
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Cal Michael [mailto:cmichael@network-data.com]
Sent: 20 October 2003 14:25
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: QoS - Shaper Questions
- Scenario:
You have a remote site that has two frame
relay VCs (P2P) on a single T1 which connect
to the central site on two different T1's,
which are located on the same router.
You have been given a multilink PPP over FR
config for both sides which proves to be
functional.
You have been asked to tweak the config and
implement traffic shaping to use LLQ versus
WFQ.
Where do you apply the service policy once
you build the appropriate class/policy-map
statements?
On the frame-relay subinterfaces which are
assigned to the multilink bundle or on the
virtual-template interface? Or both?
What commands can you issue to prove that
the the shaper is now using LLQ (strict
priority queue) and not WFQ (fair)?
--- ----- ---
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:53:05 GMT-3