RE: IP Policy load sharing

From: Ahmed Hassan (ahmed_hassan@rayatelecom.net)
Date: Wed Oct 15 2003 - 08:29:38 GMT-3


That is exactly what I did, but the load sharing is required for other traffic that go through a route-map and when ip make a route policy which point to the loopback as the next hop. The policy doesn't work

Best regards

-----Original Message-----
From: loai@kuix.com [mailto:loai@kuix.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:11 AM
To: Ahmed Hassan
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: IP Policy load sharing

Ahmad,

What I understand that u have 2 routers..between them 2 physical links..And u want to run BGP between them via 2 these links making (Load sharing)
in this case try the following:

R1
interface loopback 0
ip ad 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
!
interface e1
ip ad 3.3.3.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface e2
ip ad 6.6.6.1 255.255.255.0
!
Router bg 1
nei 2.2.2.2 remote-as 2
nei 2.2.2.2 ebgp-mulithub 255
nei 2.2.2.2 update source loopback 0

ip route 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 3.3.3.2
ip route 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255 6.6.6.2

on R2

interface loopback 0
ip ad 2.2.2.2 255.255.255.255
!
interface e1
ip ad 3.3.3.2 255.255.255.0
!
interface e2
ip ad 6.6.6.2 255.255.255.0
!
Router bg 2
nei 1.1.1.1 remote-as 1
nei 1.1.1.1 ebgp-mulithub 255
nei 1.1.1.1 update source loopback 0

ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 3.3.3.1
ip route 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255 6.6.6.1

with this method u will get load sharing B.T 2 physical connections,without using route-map

Regards

Nizar

----- Original Message -----
From: Ahmed Hassan <ahmed_hassan@rayatelecom.net>
Date: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 11:18 am
Subject: IP Policy load sharing

> Hi group
>
> I have one router 7200 that is connected to an ISP with two links
> The BGP neighbor established between me and my neighbor is based
> on the loopback of my router and the ISP ROUTER
>
> Question 1
>
> I have tried the following
> I made a policy based routing on my Router Ethernet To make the
> loopback of my ISP as the next hop of the routers but THE ROUTER
> DOESN'T APPLY THIS Policy!! IS THE NEXT HOP address should be
> directly connected to my router because when I made The next-hop
> an ip on one of my serials the policy had worked successfully
>
>
> Question 2
>
> In a route-map I Have tried to make THE next hop as follows
>
> Set ip next-hop 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 3.3.3.3
>
>
> But the router doesn't make load sharing between these next hops
> it only consider the first IP as the next-HOP. any
> reason/solution for this
>
>
> Best regards
>
> ***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials
> from:shop.groupstudy.com
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:53:02 GMT-3