From: Yasser Aly (blackyeyes00@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 15 2003 - 11:37:10 GMT-3
Hi Ahmed,
Refering to your 2nd question, set ip next-hop will use the first available
next-hop. Defining more than one next-hop is for the sake of redundancy
incase the 1st one fail, but not for the sake of load-sharing.
For the 1st question how did u apply exactly your policy using the
remote-router loopback address ?
Regards,
Yasser
>From: "Ahmed Hassan" <ahmed_hassan@rayatelecom.net>
>
>Hi group
>
>I have one router 7200 that is connected to an ISP with two links
>The BGP neighbor established between me and my neighbor is based on the
>loopback of my router and the ISP ROUTER
>
>Question 1
>
>I have tried the following
>I made a policy based routing on my Router Ethernet To make the loopback of
>my ISP as the next hop of the routers but THE ROUTER DOESN'T APPLY THIS
>Policy!! IS THE NEXT HOP address should be directly connected to my router
>because when I made The next-hop an ip on one of my serials the policy had
>worked successfully
>
>
>Question 2
>
>In a route-map I Have tried to make THE next hop as follows
>
>Set ip next-hop 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 3.3.3.3
>
>
>But the router doesn't make load sharing between these next hops it only
>consider the first IP as the next-HOP. any reason/solution for this
>
>
>Best regards
>
>***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Please help support GroupStudy by purchasing your study materials from:
>shop.groupstudy.com
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:53:02 GMT-3