From: Ozgur Guler (Garanti Teknoloji) (OzgurG@garanti.com.tr)
Date: Fri Oct 03 2003 - 13:01:20 GMT-3
how should nat work if the problem is r4,
not being able to route the packets back?
Ozgur
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Cezar Fistik
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 6:51 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Possible NAT?
Hello Ray,
Friday, October 3, 2003, 5:23:58 PM, you wrote:
BR> R1----OSPF----R2----OSPF----R3----No routing protocol running----R4
BR> Do not run a routing protocol between R3 and R4; however you
BR> should be able to ping R4 from any other router on the network.
BR> My thought was to redistribute the connected network between
BR> R3 and R4 into ospf and then do a static nat between R3 and R4.
NAT should work, you porbably missconfigured it.
Here's another solution:
The problem here is that packets arrive to R4, but R4 doesn't know
where to send them, since no routing protocol is running and I assume
static routes are not allowed as well.
You could try to implement a route-map on R4 that will forward any
locally originated ip packet to R3 and from there to the rest of the
network.
BTW, someone please tell me if a route map with a default next-hop is
considered a static route or not? If yes then my solutin sucks.
-- Best regards, Cezar mailto:cfistik@moldovacc.md***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation: Shop.GroupStudy.com***
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Nov 24 2003 - 07:52:56 GMT-3