From: Barney Gaumer (bagaumer@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Sep 19 2003 - 21:04:35 GMT-3
I've never played with a 3550 till last night.
Lemme check later tonight & post results.
B
--- Charles Church <cchurch@wamnet.com> wrote:
> Wasn't this a bug that was fixed with a software
> upgrade? Does the 1546 MTU
> come back after a wr erase and a reload?
>
> Chuck Church
> CCIE #8776, MCNE, MCSE
> Wam!Net Government Services
> 13665 Dulles Technology Dr. Ste 250
> Herndon, VA 20171
> Office: 703-480-2569
> Cell: 703-819-3495
> cchurch@wamnet.com
> PGP key:
>
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=chuck+church&op=index
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
> Barney Gaumer
> Sent: Friday, September 19, 2003 4:45 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Cat 3550 MTU
>
>
> a ways back a poster was talking about an OSPF
> Adjacency problem on his Cat 3550 - dbd retrans and
> all of that because of MTU size mismatch.
>
> I just got my 3550 and installed it in my home lab
> last night and surprise, surprise... what do you
> think
> happened.
>
> Stuck in Exstart. But what I found is that the VLAN
> int. had a bizar MTU size so I changed it to 1500 on
> the VLAN interface and everything was fine.
>
> Just kind of strange. I bought it second hand from
> a
> guy who passed CCIE and need to check the config to
> see why all of the VLAN interfaces have a 1546 MTU??
>
> Maybe delete the vlan.dat??
>
> comments??
>
> B
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site
> design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
>
> ***Get your CCIE and a FREE vacation:
> Shop.GroupStudy.com***
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:32 GMT-3