From: Oliver Cook (oliver3.geo@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Sep 18 2003 - 09:48:13 GMT-3
Alex,
I had the same problem... Split-tunnel with the same
NAT address space on both sides. It looks convincing
with NAT-T. There is no way around it, you will have
to re-address one of the sites. (Hopefully it is
mostly DHCP)
Regards,
Oliver
--- Alex Hsieh <ccie21@hotmail.com> wrote:
> hi it's Cisco vpn client
>
> regards
> Alex
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <johnrbarnes@earthlink.net>
> To: <ccie21@hotmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 7:45 AM
> Subject: RE: Overlapping network
>
>
> Alex,
>
> What are you using as the VPN client?
>
> John
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Alex Hsieh ccie21@hotmail.com
> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 15:40:27 +0000
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Overlapping network
>
>
> hi group:
>
> We have a branch office uses vpn client to
> connect back to
>
> HQ vpn3030 concentrator.However,the branch office
> has same internal
>
> network as HQ internal network.Therefore,traffic
> destined for HQ will
>
> not go through vpn tunnel and remain at local lan.Is
> there anyway to
>
> work around this issue?Thanks for help.
>
> regards
> Alex
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:30 GMT-3