From: asadovnikov (asadovnikov@comcast.net)
Date: Sat Sep 06 2003 - 02:33:18 GMT-3
Will not work for hardware switched packets although I trust you are correct
it is configurable on MSFC. To have a positive confirmation how it works
you would have to configure it, and send some traffic through the box and
see how it goes. I spend couple days playing with SmartBits and LAN
analyzers with the equipment last summer (both sup1a and sup2) and no per
packet load balancing was achieved. So the documentation is right - it does
not work.
Best regards
Alexei
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
MADMAN
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 10:13 AM
To: Mike Williams
Cc: 'Hugo Padilla Prad '; 'Brian McGahan'; 'zhang-meng'; 'Ccielab (E-mail)'
Subject: Re: Cisco 6506 and BGP problem
I haven't tested it but the per packet loadsharing appears to be
supported:
MSFC15(config)#inter vlan 64
MSFC15(config-if)#ip load-sharing per-packet
Dave
Mike Williams wrote:
>I don't see why it wouldn't. If you're using and MSFC/MSFC2 you can
>use CEF for load balancing or even just equal-cost path load balancing
>(I'm using Native IOS but I'm sure that running IOS on an MSFC on a
>65xx in Hybrid mode would use these features are they're IOS based). I
>think Brian's idea is a perfect idea that's both simple and effective.
>
>Mike W.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Hugo Padilla Prad
>Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:09 PM
>To: 'Brian McGahan'; 'zhang-meng'; 'Ccielab (E-mail)'
>Subject: RE: Cisco 6506 and BGP problem
>
>
>Brian,
>
>My understanding is that 6506 doesn't support per-packet load balance.
>Regards,
>
>-Hugo
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>Brian McGahan
>Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:18 AM
>To: 'zhang-meng'; 'Ccielab (E-mail)'
>Subject: RE: Cisco 6506 and BGP problem
>
>
>Meng,
>
> Why not just put two static default routes? With CEF you can load
>balance between these routes on a per-packet or per-destination basis.
>
>HTH,
>
>Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
>bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
>
>Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>Toll Free: 877-334-8987
>Direct: 708-362-1418 (Outside the US and Canada)
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
>zhang-meng
>Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:02 AM
>To: Ccielab (E-mail)
>Subject: Cisco 6506 and BGP problem
>
> Hi: Group
> A problem, I want to use 6506 (with layer 3 function) to connect
>with two ISP(using two 1000BaseT port) load balance, but Tel can't
>support BGP, they worried statibility.
> What kinds of solution and Could you give some suggestion and
>design.
>
> Regards
> Meng Zhang
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
-- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:24 GMT-3