From: zhang-meng (meng_zhang@call-center.com.cn)
Date: Fri Sep 05 2003 - 00:16:53 GMT-3
Hi: Guy
Thanks your response
But it is no ok for default route
for example:
two ISP
Tel ISP : router---address 201.101.1.6/30
host address 201.101.2.16/28
Edu ISP: route address 210.35.1.130/30
host address 210.39.66.0/24
When EDU a host 210.39.66.19 can't access from Tel ISP.
How to use CEF.
-----????-----
???: Hugo Padilla Prad [mailto:hpadilla@cisco.com]
????: 2003?9?5? 11:09
???: 'Brian McGahan'; 'zhang-meng'; 'Ccielab (E-mail)'
??: RE: Cisco 6506 and BGP problem
Brian,
My understanding is that 6506 doesn't support per-packet load balance.
Regards,
-Hugo
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Brian McGahan
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:18 AM
To: 'zhang-meng'; 'Ccielab (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: Cisco 6506 and BGP problem
Meng,
Why not just put two static default routes? With CEF you can
load balance between these routes on a per-packet or per-destination
basis.
HTH,
Brian McGahan, CCIE #8593
bmcgahan@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-334-8987
Direct: 708-362-1418 (Outside the US and Canada)
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
zhang-meng
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 4:02 AM
To: Ccielab (E-mail)
Subject: Cisco 6506 and BGP problem
Hi: Group
A problem, I want to use 6506 (with layer 3 function) to connect
with two ISP(using two 1000BaseT port) load balance, but Tel can't
support BGP, they worried statibility.
What kinds of solution and Could you give some suggestion and
design.
Regards
Meng Zhang
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 07:24:23 GMT-3