From: ccie2be (ccie2be@nyc.rr.com)
Date: Fri Aug 29 2003 - 11:21:16 GMT-3
Hi Paul,
I believe you're correct, however, there are two ways that I can think of
you can use to verify your config: You can check the dolye book vol I - he
has an example of just that scenario. Also, you can run debug ip packet and
see what packets are crossing the link - this second method works much
better in the lab since you won't have access to the doyle book.
Also, if you're running a fairly recent version of IOS, I don't think you
need the neighbor statements, but you should verify that with debug ip
packet. dt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul J Chen" <cpjchen@starhub.net.sg>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:23 PM
Subject: OSPF neighbor statements
> Hi ,
>
>
> I have this lab scenario:
>
> The question states that the subnet should be unicast without having
> DR/BDR concepts and no broadcast statements allowed.
>
> Would it be correct to do the following:
>
> On the hub and the spokes:
>
> On each hub and spoke's FR Interface : ip ospf network
> point-to-multipoint non-broadcast
>
> Hub Router Ospf process : neighbor x
> Neighbor y
>
> The posted solution includes neighbor statements for the hub and all the
> spokes. Is it necessary to have neighbor statements on the spokes as
> well ?
>
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
> Thanks.
> Paul
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:10 GMT-3