From: wing_lam@jossynergy.com
Date: Tue Aug 19 2003 - 12:18:12 GMT-3
Hi all;
Heard so much about IPv6 so I lab it up but fail:
My image is 12.2(15)T5.
R5----Cat 2924----R8
R5:
ipv6 unicast-routing
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.2.4 255.255.255.0
ipv6 address 200A:0:0:2::2/64
ipv6 enable
R8:
ipv6 unicast-routing
ip address 192.168.2.8 255.255.255.0
interface FastEthernet0/0
ipv6 address 200A:0:0:2::1/64
ipv6 enable
I even can't make as simple as PING to work; but R5 can ping R8 for IPv4. I
"debug ipv6 icmp" in R8 but no any comes out. But each router can IPv6 ping
itself. The following is the PING and route table.
R5#ping ipv
Target IPv6 address: 200A::2:0:0:0:1
Repeat count [5]:
Datagram size [100]:
Timeout in seconds [2]:
Extended commands? [no]:
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 200A:0:0:2::1, timeout is 2 seconds:
.Mar 6 10:25:58.985: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 200A:0:0:2::1.
.Mar 6 10:26:00.985: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 200A:0:0:2::1.
.Mar 6 10:26:02.985: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 200A:0:0:2::1.
.Mar 6 10:26:04.985: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 200A:0:0:2::1.
.Mar 6 10:26:06.985: ICMPv6: Sending echo request to 200A:0:0:2::1.
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
R5#
R5#sh ipv ro 200A:0:0:2::1
IPv6 Routing Table - 4 entries
Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, R - RIP, B - BGP
U - Per-user Static route
I1 - ISIS L1, I2 - ISIS L2, IA - ISIS interarea
O - OSPF intra, OI - OSPF inter, OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2
C 200A:0:0:2::/64 [0/0]
via ::, FastEthernet0/0
R5#sh ipv ro 200A:0:0:2::2
IPv6 Routing Table - 4 entries
Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, R - RIP, B - BGP
U - Per-user Static route
I1 - ISIS L1, I2 - ISIS L2, IA - ISIS interarea
O - OSPF intra, OI - OSPF inter, OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2
L 200A:0:0:2::2/128 [0/0]
via ::, FastEthernet0/0
R8#sh ipv ro 200A:0:0:2::2
IPv6 Routing Table - 4 entries
Codes: C - Connected, L - Local, S - Static, R - RIP, B - BGP
U - Per-user Static route
I1 - ISIS L1, I2 - ISIS L2, IA - ISIS interarea
O - OSPF intra, OI - OSPF inter, OE1 - OSPF ext 1, OE2 - OSPF ext 2
C 200A:0:0:2::/64 [0/0]
via ::, FastEthernet0/0
Do the switch need to support IPv6 also? WIll it don't understand 0x86DD?
Am I missed something?
Thx,
BBD (Big Black Dog)
Cristian Henry H
<chenry@reuna.cl> To: Todd Carswell <acarswell@nc.rr.com>
Sent by: cc: John Matijevic <matijevi@bellsouth.net>, ccie2be <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>, Group
nobody@groupstudy Study <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
.com Subject: Re: IPv6 inclusion in Lab
08/19/2003 10:39
PM
Please respond to
Cristian Henry H
I'm working on it, our national network has a IPv6 native peer MBBG with
Internet2 network with production IPv6 numbers, also we have a pTLA /32
from 6bone group to testing internally. IOS 12.2(8)T over a 7500
plataform. The unique routing protocol I've configured with IPv6 is
MBGP, it works fine. RIP has some troubles.
Todd Carswell ha escrito:
>
> This leads to a question... Is anyone out there implementing IPv6 in
> production?
>
> Todd
>
> John Matijevic wrote:
>
> >CCIE2be,
> >IPV6 functionality is in 12.2, and since there seems to be so much
> >documentation on it, I would plan on learning it. I am planning to
learn as
> >much as possible for IPV6, and if is included in major protocols, could
be
> >worth a lot more than a few points. The good news is we will be the
first
> >one hired for IPV6 projects that come up in the future. The bad news is
that
> >again there is a lot of information to learn. But I would learn this
> >technology not only for the exam but for real world. IPV6 is nothing new
> >this technology has been around for at least 5 years maybe longer. Now
the
> >IOS is starting to support it with 12.2, I imagine by 12.3 you will have
> >full support of it, and thats when the companies, will implement it.
There
> >is a lot of documentation on this that should not be taken lightly.
> >Sincerely,
> >Matijevic
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "ccie2be" <ccie2be@nyc.rr.com>
> >To: "Group Study" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 9:33 AM
> >Subject: IPv6 inclusion in Lab
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>Facts:
> >>
> >>1) On Sept. 1, the lab will be running version IOS 12.2 (which
release?
> >>unknown)
> >>
> >>2) IOS 12.2(T) supports IPv6
> >>
> >>Does that mean that IPv6 is on the lab? I don't know but I can't
imagine
> >>
> >>
> >that
> >
> >
> >>if it is it will be worth more than a few points or that correctly
> >>
> >>
> >configuring
> >
> >
> >>other technologies will be dependant on a thorough knowledge of IPv6.
> >>
> >>That's just my opinion - but I would like to hear what others think.
dt
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________________________________
> >>You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >>
> >>Subscription information may be found at:
> >>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________________________________
> >You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
> >
> >Subscription information may be found at:
> >http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> You are subscribed to the GroupStudy.com CCIE R&S Discussion Group.
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
-- Cristian E. Henry REUNAE-mail: chenry@reuna.cl Fono: 56-2-3370336
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:03 GMT-3