From: Scott Morris (swm@emanon.com)
Date: Mon Aug 18 2003 - 18:02:12 GMT-3
Only if you have the num-exp on both routers. Otherwise, PhoneB would
have to have a dial-peer matching "1" in order to get the leg started to
begin with.
The upgrade isn't really all that bad, it's just kinda freaky to put all
your faith in a backup session then wax the entire drive! :)
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
MMoniz
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:36 PM
To: swm@emanon.com; 'MMoniz'; wing_lam@jossynergy.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Voice dialnumber sequence
I totally agree. But if 4100 is a voip peer, using num-exp will allow
both phone A and phone B to dial 1 to reach this peer correct? Assuming
both Phone A and B are on the same router.
So if the question says "when phone A dials 1 it should call 4100" then
a translation rule should be used right?
Ps....looking forward to a CCM 3.3 upgrade.....yeeeehaaaah and then
pray.....
-----Original Message-----
From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm@emanon.com]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:18 PM
To: 'MMoniz'; wing_lam@jossynergy.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Voice dialnumber sequence
Heheheh... Absolutely! CallManager makes this stuff so much simpler!
In reality, I would say use num-exp where possible. It's easier and
allows you to retain your hair longer. And I can't picture any R&S
scenario where calling number patterns need to change (which would have
to be translation rules on within IOS).
Keep things simple!
If phone A dials 1 and you have a num-exp from 1 to 4100, then the dial
peer matching 4100 on RouterA (assuming match with Phone A) will be
used. This is pointed to a session target of RouterB (match Phone B)
where the digits also have to match things on the way in. An h323
connection by itself is not magically associated with a dial peer. The
connection is set up, digits are passed and peers are matched. The
number still being 4100 should match to a POTS peer for Phone B.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
MMoniz
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:58 PM
To: Scott Morris; 'MMoniz'; wing_lam@jossynergy.com;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Voice dialnumber sequence
I agree...I know I scratched mine a few times over this. Thankfully all
this is handled in Call Manager for my real net. Would you say this is a
good rule of thumb.
If the question states Phone A should call 4100 when 1 is dialed and
Phone A is the only phone on the router, use num-exp?
But if there is more than 1 phone on the router the only choice is to
use translation pattern on the voice port connecting phone A?
Otherwise Phone B will be subjected to the num-exp or translation rule
on the dial-peer also, correct?
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Scott Morris
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 3:37 PM
To: 'MMoniz'; wing_lam@jossynergy.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Voice dialnumber sequence
The translation rules, if on a voice port are kinda tricky... By this,
it depends on the command structure for which way things happen!
Translation rules are one of those things that make you scratch your
head a few times. :)
So with your rule set, if the call is coming IN to the voice-port,
translation occurs first. Look at the "test translation rule" command
to watch the flow.
You can also apply the rule to a voip peer with the "voip-incoming
translation-rule" or "translate-outgoing" commands.
For more information, check out:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1835/products_configur
ation_guide_chapter09186a0080080aec.html
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: MMoniz [mailto:ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 1:54 PM
To: Scott Morris; wing_lam@jossynergy.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Voice dialnumber sequence
Scott, aren't translation rules applied before a dial peer match on a
voice port? So if I have this rule applied to the voice port, the
translation happens first when this phone dials?
translation-rule 1
Rule 0 ^1 4100
Rule 1 ^2. 4100
Rule 2 ^3.. 4100
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Scott Morris
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 7:19 AM
To: wing_lam@jossynergy.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Voice dialnumber sequence
Num-exp is done after digits are captured (digit analysis) but BEFORE
matching to a dial peer.
Translation rules, applied to peers/ports are done at that point in
time, so AFTER matching to a dial peer.
So match based on whether you are changing the rules before or after
match. :)
HTH,
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
wing_lam@jossynergy.com
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2003 4:23 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Voice dialnumber sequence
Hi group,
When a POTS inbound calling to 14085551234, I would like to ask
following:
1) When a Translation rule 1408 --> 8 is configured and
"translate-outgoing called" is configured in the VoIP dial-peer, what
should I use in the destination pattern in a VoIP dial-peer? 14085551234
or 85551234?
2) If a "num-exp 1234 14085551234" is configured, what should I use in
the destination pattern in a VoIP dial-peer? 1234 or 14085551234?
Any good link mentioning above matching sequcncy?
Thx,
BBD (Big Black Dog)
DISCLAIMER:- This email is confidential and intended only for the use
of the individual or entity named above and may contain information that
is privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this email is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please
notify us immediately by return email or telephone and destroy the
original message. Thank you.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:01 GMT-3