From: Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com
Date: Sun Aug 17 2003 - 13:45:23 GMT-3
Many thx.
-----Original Message-----
From: Danny Andaluz [mailto:dannyandaluz@comcast.net]
Sent: 17 August 2003 17:39
To: Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: OSPF and Loopbacks
Take a look at this, Ken. It's RFC 2328 for OSPF version 2. This should
clear it up for you. It did for me.
http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/rfc/rfc2328.html#sec-9.1
<http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/rfc/rfc2328.html#sec-9.1>
Danny
----- Original Message -----
From: Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com
<mailto:Ken.Farrington@barclayscapital.com>
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com <mailto:ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 11:56 AM
Subject: OSPF and Loopbacks
Hi Guys,
Hope everyone in the US has power now :)
One very quick one. Why does OSPF advertise loopbacks with a /32 bit mask,
if the loopback is configured as a network ie,
int lo 601
ip address network 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
many thx, and I hope someone alse has seen this.
Kind regards,
Ken
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about Barclays Capital, please
visit our web site at http://www.barcap.com <http://www.barcap.com> .
Internet communications are not secure and therefore the Barclays
Group does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this
message. Although the Barclays Group operates anti-virus programmes,
it does not accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever that is
caused by viruses being passed. Any views or opinions presented are
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the
Barclays Group. Replies to this email may be monitored by the Barclays
Group for operational or business reasons.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:54:00 GMT-3