From: asadovnikov (asadovnikov@comcast.net)
Date: Sat Aug 16 2003 - 01:58:20 GMT-3
If "passthru" is present then it is Direct, if not then it is Lite. See
DLSW design guide for details
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iworksw/ps2474/prod_technical_referen
ce09186a008007ce40.html.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Shawn Yang
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 3:36 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: DLSW direct over FR
Hi there,
Here are couple of questions on DLSW direct encapsulation over Frame Relay.
1: The dlsw local-peer statement.
The local-peer specificies this router's IP addr. But FR direct has no
IP
involved, so why use IP addr?
2: This statement also takes a different format than TCP encap.
For TCP: dlsw local-peer peer-id 10.2.23.1
For FR direct: dlsw local-peer 10.2.23.1
Notice the keyword "peer-id" is gone.
3: Do we need "passthru" in "remote-peer" statement?
The Cisco CD shows yes. Some other sources shows no.
dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface serial 0 30 "passthru"
http://127.0.0.1:8080/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fibm_c/bcfpa
rt2/bcfdlsw.htm#11895
Shawn
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:59 GMT-3