RE: SNA ACL

From: Rajagopal S (raj_ccie@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Aug 15 2003 - 13:05:40 GMT-3

• Next message: Rajagopal S: "Re: Ping No Routing Switch LB Addresses"
• Previous message: ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com: "Re: bgp synchronization problem"
• Maybe in reply to: Alec: "SNA ACL"
• Next in thread: Alvarez, Rolando [NCSUS]: "RE: SNA ACL"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi all,
 
Can anybody let me know the different HEX values associated with this access filtering ?
as 0x0000 0x0d0d - SNA.
 
Cheers
Raj

Joe Martin <jmartin@capitalpremium.net> wrote:
Check the erratta on that book at ciscopress.com, it will tell you that
option 1 is indeed correct.

HTH,

Joe Martin
CCIE #12035

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of Alec
Sent: August 14, 2003 10:19 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: SNA ACL

Which of the following ACL to filter SNA is correct ?

1. access-list 200 permit 0x0000 0x0d0d
2. access-list 200 permit 0x0d0d 0x0000

Personaly, I think option 1 is correct. Yet I read the Cisco Practical
Studies book which refers to option 2. Your advice please.

regards,
alec

• Next message: Rajagopal S: "Re: Ping No Routing Switch LB Addresses"
• Previous message: ccie2002@tampabay.rr.com: "Re: bgp synchronization problem"
• Maybe in reply to: Alec: "SNA ACL"
• Next in thread: Alvarez, Rolando [NCSUS]: "RE: SNA ACL"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 18:53:59 GMT-3